Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam BDS-C00 Topic 7 Question 104 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's BDS-C00 exam
Question #: 104
Topic #: 7
[All BDS-C00 Questions]

An organization would like to run analytics on their Elastic Load Balancing logs stored in Amazon S3 and join this data with other tables in Amazon S3. The users are currently using a BI tool connecting with JDBC and would like to keep using this BI tool.

Which solution would result in the LEAST operational overhead?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Erasmo
2 months ago
I'd go with option E: hire a team of monkeys to manually transcribe the logs into a spreadsheet. Guaranteed zero operational overhead!
upvoted 0 times
Juan
9 days ago
Yeah, using Lambda to transform and move the logs to an optimized bucket for querying with Athena sounds efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malika
16 days ago
I agree, option C seems like the best choice to minimize operational overhead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
1 months ago
That's a creative solution, but I think we should stick with the options provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Belen
2 months ago
I'm not a fan of long-running clusters, so B is out for me. I think I'll go with C - the optimized data structure and Athena seem like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Dominque
3 days ago
Yeah, I prefer a more streamlined solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
1 months ago
I agree, long-running clusters can be a hassle.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sarah
2 months ago
Haha, I remember this kind of question from my AWS certification prep! Personally, I'd go for C. Athena is just so darn convenient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Son
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards D. The transient EMR cluster seems like the simplest solution, and Redshift integration should work well with the BI tool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
2 months ago
This is a tricky one! I'm torn between C and D, but I think C might have the edge in terms of operational overhead.
upvoted 0 times
Edison
1 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Using Lambda to transform and move the files to an optimized bucket seems like a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
2 months ago
I think C is the way to go, it seems like it would be less overhead.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nu
2 months ago
I prefer option D. Launching a transient EMR cluster every night for transformation and loading seems like a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Altha
2 months ago
I agree with King. Using Lambda to transform and move files to an optimized bucket seems efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
3 months ago
I think option C would result in the least operational overhead.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77