Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam BDS-C00 Topic 5 Question 79 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's BDS-C00 exam
Question #: 79
Topic #: 5
[All BDS-C00 Questions]

You are managing the AWS account of a big organization. The organization has more than

1000+ employees and they want to provide access to the various services to most of the employees. Which of the below mentioned options is the best possible solution in this case?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Erinn
2 months ago
If I had to manage over 1000 IAM users, I'd need a lot of coffee and a strong sense of patience. Option C is definitely the sanest choice.
upvoted 0 times
Bernardo
21 hours ago
I agree, managing individual IAM users for over 1000 employees would be a nightmare. Grouping them by department is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shakira
3 days ago
Option C is definitely the best choice. Creating IAM groups for each department will make access control much easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Freeman
2 months ago
Option C is the way to go. Grouping users by department is like herding cats, but it's the most efficient solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Ezekiel
6 days ago
Attaching an IAM role with the organization's authentication service might be too complex for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toi
8 days ago
Creating separate IAM users for each employee would be too cumbersome in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
24 days ago
I agree, grouping users by department will make it easier to manage access control.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marilynn
2 months ago
I like how option B uses STS to authenticate users on the EC2 instance. That's a clever way to handle a large user base.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
2 months ago
That's a valid point, but I still think option C would be more efficient for managing access permissions for a large organization with over 1000 employees.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
2 months ago
Option A is way too much work for a company with over 1000 employees. Imagine creating and managing all those individual IAM users! No thanks!
upvoted 0 times
Julian
1 months ago
C) The user should create IAM groups as per the organization's departments and add each user to the group for better access control
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
2 months ago
A) The user should create a separate IAM user for each employee and provide access to them as per the policy
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sanda
2 months ago
Option D seems like a good idea too. Integrating the organization's authentication service with IAM roles could simplify the process and improve security.
upvoted 0 times
Winfred
1 months ago
D) Attach an IAM role with the organization's authentication service to authorize each user for various AWS services
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
1 months ago
C) The user should create IAM groups as per the organization's departments and add each user to the group for better access control
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
1 months ago
A) The user should create a separate IAM user for each employee and provide access to them as per the policy
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Selma
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option A is more suitable as it provides individual access to each employee and ensures better security measures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
2 months ago
I think option C is the best solution. Creating IAM groups based on the organization's departments and adding each user to the appropriate group will make it easier to manage access control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
3 months ago
I think option C is the best solution because it allows for better access control by organizing users into groups based on departments.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77