Amazon Exam BDS-C00 Topic 12 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's BDS-C00 exam

Question #: 78
Topic #: 12

A medical record filing system for a government medical fund is using an Amazon S3 bucket to archive documents related to patients. Every patient visit to a physician creates a new file, which can add up to millions of files each month. Collection of these files from each physician is handled via a batch process that runs every night using AWS Data Pipeline. This is sensitive data, so the data and any associated metadata must be encrypted at rest.

Auditors review some files on a quarterly basis to see whether the records are maintained according to regulations. Auditors must be able to locate any physical file in the S3 bucket or a given data, patient, or physician. Auditors spend a signification amount of time locating such files.

What is the most cost-and time-efficient collection methodology in this situation?

AUse Amazon kinesis to get the data feeds directly from physician, batch them using a Spark application on Amazon Elastic MapReduce (EMR) and then store them in Amazon S3 with folders separated per physician.

BUse Amazon API Gateway to get the data feeds directly from physicians, batch them using a Spark application on Amazon Elastic MapReduce (EMR), and then store them in Amazon S3 with folders separated per physician.

CUse Amazon S3 event notifications to populate an Amazon DynamoDB table with metadata about every file loaded to Amazon S3, and partition them based on the month and year of the file.

DUse Amazon S3 event notifications to populate and Amazon Redshift table with metadata about every file loaded to Amazon S3, and partition them based on the month and year of the file.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Chanel at Aug 09, 2023, 02:08 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium BDS-C00 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Cyndy

2 months ago

I'm just glad I don't have to deal with this many files on a daily basis. That must be a real headache for the IT team!

upvoted 0 times

Mindy

6 days ago

C: It must be a huge challenge for the IT team to ensure everything is stored and encrypted properly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Justine

9 days ago

B: Definitely! I can't imagine the amount of work that goes into organizing all that data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Isidra

13 days ago

C: Using Amazon S3 event notifications to populate a DynamoDB table seems like a good way to organize the files efficiently.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerrod

14 days ago

B: Definitely! I can't imagine having to locate specific files for auditors on a regular basis.

upvoted 0 times

...

Krystina

17 days ago

A: I agree, managing millions of files each month sounds like a nightmare.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barrett

1 months ago

A: I agree, managing millions of files each month sounds like a nightmare.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fletcher

2 months ago

Putting the metadata in Redshift instead of DynamoDB is an interesting twist. I wonder if that would be more efficient for the auditing process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reta

2 months ago

Partitioning the files in DynamoDB based on the month and year could be a good way to make it easier for auditors to locate specific files. I like that approach.

upvoted 0 times

Fernanda

6 days ago

D: I agree, having a structured way to organize the files would save time for auditors during their quarterly reviews.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jaime

23 days ago

C: Using Amazon kinesis to get the data feeds directly from physicians and then storing them in Amazon S3 with folders separated per physician could also be efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sabra

1 months ago

B: Yeah, that would definitely make it easier for auditors to locate specific files when needed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lai

2 months ago

A: I think using Amazon S3 event notifications to populate an Amazon DynamoDB table with metadata and partitioning based on the month and year is a good idea.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hildred

2 months ago

Using Kinesis to get the data feeds directly from the physicians sounds like a good idea, but I'm not sure if it's the most cost-effective.

upvoted 0 times

Vanna

1 months ago

B: Yeah, that could help with organizing the files efficiently.

upvoted 0 times

...

Meaghan

2 months ago

A: I think using Amazon S3 event notifications to populate an Amazon DynamoDB table with metadata about every file loaded to Amazon S3 is a good option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Josephine

2 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky question. I'll have to think carefully about the cost and time efficiency of each option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenda

2 months ago

That's a good point, option C could indeed save time for auditors by organizing files based on month and year.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaun

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe option C is more efficient as it uses Amazon S3 event notifications to populate a DynamoDB table with metadata.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenda

3 months ago

I think option A is the best choice because it directly gets data feeds from physicians and stores them in folders per physician.

upvoted 0 times

...