Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam ANS-C01 Topic 5 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's ANS-C01 exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 5
[All ANS-C01 Questions]

A real estate company is building an internal application so that real estate agents can upload photos and videos of various properties. The application will store these photos and videos in an Amazon S3 bucket as objects and will use Amazon DynamoDB to store corresponding metadat

a. The S3 bucket will be configured to publish all PUT events for new object uploads to an Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) queue.

A compute cluster of Amazon EC2 instances will poll the SQS queue to find out about newly uploaded objects. The cluster will retrieve new objects, perform proprietary image and video recognition and classification update metadata in DynamoDB and replace the objects with new watermarked objects. The company does not want public IP addresses on the EC2 instances.

Which networking design solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively as application usage increases?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lavera
4 days ago
Haha, I remember my first time taking a cloud certification exam. All these networking options can be a bit overwhelming, but I think Option B is the way to go. It's a classic setup that should work well for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
8 days ago
I'm not sure about option C. I think option B could also work well by using a NAT gateway for internet access. But I see the benefits of using VPC endpoints in option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
10 days ago
I agree with Cassi. Option C seems like the most secure and cost-effective solution for our application as it scales.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
13 days ago
I'm leaning towards Option D. The use of a gateway VPC endpoint for SQS and interface VPC endpoints for S3 and DynamoDB seems like a more secure and efficient setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
14 days ago
I think option C is the best choice. It allows us to keep the EC2 instances in a private subnet while still being able to access the necessary services through VPC endpoints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marquetta
16 days ago
Option C seems like the most cost-effective solution. Using VPC endpoints eliminates the need for a NAT gateway or internet gateway, which can be expensive as usage increases.
upvoted 0 times
Rhea
4 days ago
I agree, option C seems like the most cost-effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yaeko
17 days ago
But with option D, we only need one gateway VPC endpoint for SQS, S3, and DynamoDB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
20 days ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yaeko
24 days ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77