Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam ANS-C01 Topic 2 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's ANS-C01 exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 2
[All ANS-C01 Questions]

An organization is using a VPC endpoint for Amazon S3. When the security group rules for a set of instances were initially configured, access was restricted to allow traffic only to the IP addresses of the Amazon S3 API endpoints in the region from the published JSON file. The application was working properly, but now is logging a growing number of timeouts when connecting with Amazon S3. No internet gateway is configured for the VPC.

Which solution will fix the connectivity failures with the LEAST amount of effort?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Tatum
1 months ago
I'd just tell the application to stop timing out. Problem solved! But in all seriousness, C looks like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Carol
19 days ago
I think C is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Billye
2 months ago
You know, this reminds me of that time I accidentally locked myself out of my own VPC. Good times. Anyway, I'm with the crowd on C - keep it simple, silly!
upvoted 0 times
Albert
15 days ago
I agree, let's go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
17 days ago
Yeah, updating the outbound security group sounds like the easiest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kandis
1 months ago
I think C is the way to go. Keep it simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorita
2 months ago
I'd be careful with that Lambda function idea. Seems like adding another moving part might just complicate things further. C looks like the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
2 months ago
Hmm, I see what they're getting at. Updating the routing table might be a bit overkill. I'm leaning towards C as well, seems the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
Ezekiel
3 days ago
I'm not sure, but updating the security group does sound like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
19 days ago
Agreed, it seems like the simplest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
1 months ago
I think C is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Justine
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but creating a Lambda function to update the security group also sounds like a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rocco
2 months ago
I agree with Carri, that option seems like it would require the least amount of effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carri
2 months ago
I think the best solution is to update the VPC routing to direct Amazon S3 traffic to the VPC endpoint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
2 months ago
Ah, the good old AWS VPC endpoint debacle. Classic networking challenge right here. I'm going with option C - updating the security group seems like the quickest fix to me.
upvoted 0 times
Sueann
21 days ago
Maybe, but updating the security group is the quickest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brianne
27 days ago
But wouldn't creating a Lambda function be more efficient?
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
29 days ago
I agree, updating the security group should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loise
1 months ago
Option C sounds like the easiest fix.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cherrie
2 months ago
That could work too, but I think updating the application server's outbound security group might be a quicker solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerilyn
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe creating a Lambda function to update the security group based on AmazonIPSpaceChanged notifications is the easiest fix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherrie
3 months ago
I think the best solution is to update the VPC routing to direct Amazon S3 traffic to the VPC endpoint.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77