Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam ANS-C01 Topic 1 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's ANS-C01 exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 1
[All ANS-C01 Questions]

A company has expanded its network to the AWS Cloud by using a hybrid architecture with multiple AWS accounts. The company has set up a shared AWS account for the connection to its on-premises data centers and the company offices. The workloads consist of private web-based services for internal use. These services run in different AWS accounts. Office-based employees consume these services by using a DNS name in an on-premises DNS zone that is named example.internal.

The process to register a new service that runs on AWS requires a manual and complicated change request to the internal DNS. The process involves many teams.

The company wants to update the DNS registration process by giving the service creators access that will allow them to register their DNS records. A network engineer must design a solution that will achieve this goal. The solution must maximize cost-effectiveness and must require the least possible number of configuration changes.

Which combination of steps should the network engineer take to meet these requirements? (Choose three.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, D

To meet the requirements of updating the DNS registration process while maximizing cost-effectiveness and minimizing configuration changes, the network engineer should take the following steps:

Create an Amazon Route 53 Resolver inbound endpoint in the shared account VPC. Create a conditional forwarder for a domain named aws.example.internal on the on-premises DNS servers. Set the forwarding IP addresses to the inbound endpoint's IP addresses that were created (Option B).

Create an Amazon Route 53 private hosted zone named aws.example.internal in the shared AWS account to resolve queries for this domain (Option D).

Create a record for each service in its local private hosted zone (serviceA.account1.aws.example.internal). Provide this DNS record to the employees who need access (Option A).

These steps will allow service creators to register their DNS records while keeping costs low and minimizing configuration changes.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Kip
1 months ago
Hmm, Option F with the private hosted zones in the shared account could work, but it might get a bit complex to manage all those zones. I'd try to keep things as simple as possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
1 months ago
Option E with the BIND servers sounds a bit overkill. Why not just use the built-in Route 53 features in Options B and D? That seems simpler and more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
Elin
11 days ago
I think sticking with the built-in Route 53 features will definitely be more cost-effective and require fewer configuration changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
13 days ago
Yeah, setting up BIND servers in Option E does seem like a lot of extra work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
17 days ago
I agree, using Route 53 features in Options B and D seems like a more straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yolando
2 months ago
Option C is a bit of a head-scratcher. Forwarding queries to on-premises servers when the goal is to move to the cloud? I think we can do better than that.
upvoted 0 times
Lon
14 days ago
A: That sounds like a more efficient approach. It would simplify the process for service creators to register their DNS records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
18 days ago
B: I agree. Maybe we should consider options that involve creating private hosted zones in the shared AWS account for each service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
28 days ago
A: Option C does seem counterintuitive. We should focus on solutions that align with moving to the cloud.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mila
2 months ago
I'm not sure about option A. I think option E might be more cost-effective in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Callie
2 months ago
Haha, Option E with the BIND servers sounds like a job for the DNS wizard themselves. I hope they have their robe and wand ready!
upvoted 0 times
Denae
23 days ago
User 2: Definitely! Those BIND servers seem like they will do some magic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shalon
24 days ago
User 1: Haha, Option E does sound like a job for a DNS wizard!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fallon
2 months ago
I agree with you, Clarinda. Option A seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarinda
2 months ago
I think option A is a good choice. It allows service creators to register their DNS records.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77