Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Amazon Exam ANS-C01 Topic 1 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for Amazon's ANS-C01 exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 1
[All ANS-C01 Questions]

A company has two business units (BUs). The company operates in the us-east-1 Region and the us-west-1 Region. The company plans to extend to more Regions in the future. Each BU has

a VPC in each Region. Each Region has a transit gateway with the BU VPCs attached. The transit gateways in both Regions are peered.

The company will create several more BUs in the future and will need to isolate some of the BUs from the other BUs. The company wants to migrate to an architecture to incorporate more

Regions and BUs.

Which solution will meet these requirements with the MOST operational efficiency?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jerilyn
1 months ago
I'm just glad the question didn't involve any AWS Outposts or Wavelength Zones. That would have been a real head-scratcher.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonso
1 months ago
Option D seems like the lazy way out. Just attaching new VPCs to the existing transit gateways? Where's the innovation, people? Let's go with the AWS Cloud WAN option and really impress the boss.
upvoted 0 times
Elouise
10 days ago
Let's go with the Cloud WAN option and show some real progress in our architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
14 days ago
I agree, the Cloud WAN option seems more innovative and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
19 days ago
Option D is the easy way, but we need to impress the boss with the AWS Cloud WAN option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
23 days ago
That sounds like a better plan. Let's impress the boss with a more advanced architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
25 days ago
I agree, let's go with the AWS Cloud WAN option for a more innovative solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
1 months ago
Option D is the easy way, but not the most efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dominque
2 months ago
I bet the AWS Cloud WAN core network in options B and C will be a hit with the hipsters in the company. They'll probably want to add some blockchain integration and a microservices architecture while they're at it.
upvoted 0 times
Cristal
10 days ago
I think the hipsters in the company will definitely be excited about the potential blockchain integration and microservices architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
17 days ago
Yeah, I agree. The AWS Cloud WAN core network seems like a scalable option for future growth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eloisa
1 months ago
Option B sounds like a cool and modern solution for the company's expansion.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hubert
2 months ago
I'm not a fan of the transit gateway approach in option A. Creating a new transit gateway for each BU in each Region sounds like a lot of overhead and maintenance. Option C looks like a cleaner and more scalable solution.
upvoted 0 times
Quinn
14 days ago
Yeah, it definitely seems like a more efficient solution for future growth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anabel
15 days ago
Creating a Cloud WAN core network in both Regions sounds like a good way to isolate BUs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
24 days ago
I agree, Option C with the AWS Cloud WAN core network seems like a more streamlined approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmanuel
25 days ago
I agree, Option C seems like a more streamlined approach for future scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
27 days ago
Option A seems like it could get messy with all those transit gateways to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
1 months ago
I agree, Option C seems more streamlined and easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
1 months ago
Option A seems like it could get messy with all those transit gateways.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
1 months ago
Option A seems like it could get messy with all those transit gateways.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lakeesha
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B. Creating a Cloud WAN core network with segments seems like a scalable solution for future expansion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is better. It's simpler to just attach new VPCs to existing transit gateways.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. It seems like the most efficient way to control traffic between BUs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
2 months ago
That's a valid point, Annamae. But I still think creating new transit gateways for each BU will offer better control over traffic between BUs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more efficient. Attaching new VPCs to existing transit gateways will simplify the architecture and reduce complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
2 months ago
The question is pretty straightforward. I think option C is the best solution as it allows for the creation of an AWS Cloud WAN core network with segment isolation to control traffic between the BUs. This seems to be the most operationally efficient approach.
upvoted 0 times
Werner
1 months ago
But option C seems to offer a more comprehensive solution with segment isolation for better control over traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
1 months ago
I think option A could also work by creating new transit gateways for each BU and updating route tables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
2 months ago
Creating a Cloud WAN core network with segment isolation does sound like a good way to manage the traffic between the BUs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jodi
2 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the most efficient solution for isolating traffic between the BUs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raelene
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. Creating new transit gateways for each new BU will provide the needed isolation and operational efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77