Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Alibaba Exam ACA-Developer Topic 6 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for Alibaba's ACA-Developer exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 6
[All ACA-Developer Questions]

A Developer is asked to implement a caching layer in front of RDS. Cached content is expensive to regenerate in case of service failure. Which implementation below would work while maintaining maximum uptime?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Serina
1 months ago
Ah, the classic 'cache or HBase' dilemma. I wonder if they'll also consider implementing a blockchain-based microservices architecture to really make things interesting.
upvoted 0 times
Alaine
9 days ago
C: Implement ApsaraDB for Redis in Standard Mode
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
25 days ago
B: Install Redis on an ECS instance
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
1 months ago
A: Implement ApsaraDB for Redis in Cluster Mode
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Colton
2 months ago
ApsaraDB for Redis in Standard Mode could work, but I think the Cluster Mode is a better choice to handle the expensive cached content in case of service failures.
upvoted 0 times
Maybelle
13 days ago
A: Definitely, it's important to have a reliable caching layer in case of service failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
1 months ago
B: I agree, it would help maintain maximum uptime for the cached content.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
1 months ago
A: I think implementing ApsaraDB for Redis in Cluster Mode would be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Krissy
2 months ago
Installing Redis on an ECS instance might work, but I'm worried about managing the Redis server and ensuring high uptime. The managed ApsaraDB for Redis solution seems more appealing.
upvoted 0 times
Donette
10 days ago
A: I think implementing ApsaraDB for Redis in Cluster Mode would be the best option for maximum uptime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
19 days ago
D: Migrating the ROS database to HBase seems like a drastic solution compared to using ApsaraDB for Redis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
26 days ago
C: ApsaraDB for Redis in Standard Mode could also work well for maintaining high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
1 months ago
B: I agree, managing a Redis server on an ECS instance could be risky in terms of uptime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
1 months ago
A: I think implementing ApsaraDB for Redis in Cluster Mode would be the best option for maximum uptime.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenda
2 months ago
That's a good point, but I still think option A is the safest choice for maintaining maximum uptime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is better as ApsaraDB for Redis in Standard Mode is more cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
2 months ago
I'm not sure about migrating the RDS database to HBase just to save the cache layer. That seems like overkill and could introduce more complexity than necessary.
upvoted 0 times
Mila
1 months ago
B: I agree, it would provide high availability and scalability for the caching layer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
2 months ago
A: I think implementing ApsaraDB for Redis in Cluster Mode would be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luisa
2 months ago
Implementing ApsaraDB for Redis in Cluster Mode sounds like the way to go. It'll provide high availability and scalability for the caching layer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenda
2 months ago
I think option A would work best because ApsaraDB for Redis in Cluster Mode provides high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option C could also work well since ApsaraDB for Redis in Standard Mode is also a good choice for caching.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
2 months ago
I agree with Jennifer, option A seems like the most reliable choice for maintaining uptime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
2 months ago
I think option A would work best because ApsaraDB for Redis in Cluster Mode provides high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77