Alibaba Exam ACA-Database Topic 5 Question 75 Discussion

Actual exam question for Alibaba's ACA-Database exam

Question #: 75
Topic #: 5

[All ACA-Database Questions]

What is the maximum number of read-only nodes in a PolarDB cluster?

C10

D15

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, B, D, E

by Tawny at Nov 13, 2024, 05:44 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ACA-Database Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Margarita

1 months ago

Wait, does this mean I can have a 'polar bear' in my PolarDB cluster? I'm going with B, just to be on the safe side.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paul

1 months ago

This question is making me feel a bit 'polar-ized'. I'll go with A, just to keep things simple.

upvoted 0 times

Nakisha

5 days ago

I think the answer is A) 1.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ellen

2 months ago

Ha! I bet the developers were feeling a bit 'polar' when they set the max at 15. I'm sticking with D just to see what happens.

upvoted 0 times

Margurite

12 days ago

I'm curious too, I'll go with D and see if it's 15.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenny

16 days ago

I'm going with option C, 10 read-only nodes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefanie

1 months ago

I think the max number of read-only nodes is 10.

upvoted 0 times

...

Macy

2 months ago

Wait, 15 read-only nodes? That sounds like a lot. I'm going to go with C, 10 seems more reasonable for a PolarDB cluster.

upvoted 0 times

Susy

1 months ago

Yeah, 15 read-only nodes does sound like a lot. I think C, 10, is the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Therese

2 months ago

I agree, 10 read-only nodes does seem like a reasonable number for a PolarDB cluster.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorita

2 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'm guessing the answer is B, since 5 is a nice round number for a cluster, right?

upvoted 0 times

Alfreda

23 days ago

Thanks for clarifying. I'll remember that for next time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carman

1 months ago

Exactly, it's not 5. It's 10 read-only nodes in a PolarDB cluster.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marleen

1 months ago

Oh, I see. That makes sense. So, it's not B) 5 after all.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kallie

2 months ago

I think the answer is actually C) 10, because PolarDB clusters can have up to 10 read-only nodes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Irene

2 months ago

I agree with Michel, C) 10 makes sense for better scalability and fault tolerance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Michel

2 months ago

I believe it's C) 10 because having more read-only nodes can improve read performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carin

2 months ago

I think the answer is A) 1.

upvoted 0 times

...