Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AIWMI Exam CCRA-L2 Topic 4 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for AIWMI's CCRA-L2 exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 4
[All CCRA-L2 Questions]

''Following four entities operate in the Indian IT and BPO space. They all are into same segment of providing off-shore analytical services. They all operate on the labour cost-arbitrage in India and the countries of their clients. Following information pertains for the year ended March 31, 2013.

The year FY13, was typically a good year for Indian IT companies. For FY14, the economic analysts have given following predictions about the IT Industry:

A) It is expected that INR will appreciate sharply against other USD.

B) Given high inflation and attrition in IT Industry in India, the wages of IT sector employees will increase more sharply than Inflation and general wage rise in country.

C) US Congress will be passing a bill which restricts the outsourcing to third world countries like India.While analyzing the four entities, you come across following findings related to Glowing:

Glowing is promoted by Mr.M R Bhutta, who has earlier promoted two other business ventures, He started with ABC Entertainment Ltd in 1996 and was promoter and MD of the company. ABC was a listed entity and its share price had sharp movements at the time of stock market scam in late 1990s. In 1999, Mr.Bhutta sold his entire stake and resigned from the post of MD. The stock price declined by about 90% in coming days and has never recovered. Later on in 2003, Mr.Bhutta again promoted a new business, Klear Publications Ltd (KCL) an in the business of magazine publication. The entity had come out with a successful IPO and raised money from public. Thereafter it ran into troubles and reported losses. In 2009, Mr.Bhutta went on to exit this business as well by selling stake to other promoter(s). There have been reports in both instances with allegations that promoters have siphoned off money from listed entities to other group entities, however, nothing has been proved in any court.''

Based solely on Total Debt to EBITDA and Interest Coverage, which of the four entities is best amongst the four respectively:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jerlene
20 hours ago
Glamorous and Glowing, eh? Guess the promoter's got a flair for flashy names, but the numbers don't lie. Let's hope they're more substance than style.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
14 days ago
Yes, especially considering the history of the promoter and the past performance of the other entities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamonica
17 days ago
Glowing and Beautiful, huh? Sounds like a beauty pageant, not a financial analysis. I hope the examiners are more discerning than that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolann
18 days ago
Glamorous and Glamorous? Seems like a double whammy! I bet someone's trying to pull a fast one on us.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathalie
20 days ago
I agree with you, Glowing seems to have a better financial position compared to the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
22 days ago
I think Glowing might be the best based on Total Debt to EBITDA and Interest Coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77