Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AICPA Exam CPA-Auditing Topic 3 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for AICPA's CPA-Auditing exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 3
[All CPA-Auditing Questions]

Which of the following is not a required procedure in an engagement to review the interim financial information of a publicly held entity?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Choice 'b' is correct. A report on internal control related matters noted in an audit should not state that there are no significant deficiencies in internal control, since this statement might erroneously imply that the auditor searched for such conditions.

Choice 'a' is incorrect. The auditor is permitted to state that no material weaknesses were identified during the audit. Typically this occurs in reports submitted to governmental authorities.

Choice 'c' is incorrect. The auditor may suggest that corrective follow-up action should be taken due to the relative significance of material weakness discovered.

Choice 'd' is incorrect. The auditor's report may state that his or her consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose all significant deficiencies that exist.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Louisa
1 months ago
Wait, so we're not even supposed to check if the company might go bankrupt? That's like having a doctor do a checkup without checking your vital signs. Sounds like a recipe for disaster to me.
upvoted 0 times
Lakeesha
18 days ago
A) Obtaining corroborating evidence about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tawanna
2 months ago
Ah, I see. So they just want us to make sure the numbers add up, but don't really care about the underlying financial health of the company. Interesting approach.
upvoted 0 times
Jerry
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that's one of the required procedures in the engagement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
2 months ago
User 1: I think we need to compare revenue data for the current period with past periods.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hubert
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Shouldn't we be checking for fraud and other financial shenanigans? I'd rather play it safe and go with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karon
2 months ago
Really? I would have thought that was an important step. Oh well, I guess the reviewers don't care if the company is about to go under as long as the numbers look good on paper.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
2 months ago
I think option A is the correct answer. Obtaining evidence about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern is not a required procedure in an interim review engagement.
upvoted 0 times
Tasia
1 months ago
I think option A is not necessary for reviewing interim financial information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queenie
1 months ago
I agree, option A is not a required procedure in an interim review engagement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
2 months ago
I believe option A is not the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
2 months ago
I think option A is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Christiane
2 months ago
Hmm, I see your point. Let's discuss further to figure out the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delpha
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) Inquiring of management about their knowledge of fraud or suspected fraud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) Obtaining corroborating evidence about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77