Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AICPA Exam CPA-Auditing Topic 3 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for AICPA's CPA-Auditing exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 3
[All CPA-Auditing Questions]

Which of the following is not a required procedure in an engagement to review the interim financial information of a publicly held entity?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Choice 'b' is correct. A report on internal control related matters noted in an audit should not state that there are no significant deficiencies in internal control, since this statement might erroneously imply that the auditor searched for such conditions.

Choice 'a' is incorrect. The auditor is permitted to state that no material weaknesses were identified during the audit. Typically this occurs in reports submitted to governmental authorities.

Choice 'c' is incorrect. The auditor may suggest that corrective follow-up action should be taken due to the relative significance of material weakness discovered.

Choice 'd' is incorrect. The auditor's report may state that his or her consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose all significant deficiencies that exist.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Tawanna
8 days ago
Ah, I see. So they just want us to make sure the numbers add up, but don't really care about the underlying financial health of the company. Interesting approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
12 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Shouldn't we be checking for fraud and other financial shenanigans? I'd rather play it safe and go with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karon
14 days ago
Really? I would have thought that was an important step. Oh well, I guess the reviewers don't care if the company is about to go under as long as the numbers look good on paper.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
15 days ago
I think option A is the correct answer. Obtaining evidence about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern is not a required procedure in an interim review engagement.
upvoted 0 times
Lettie
2 days ago
I think option A is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Christiane
20 days ago
Hmm, I see your point. Let's discuss further to figure out the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delpha
23 days ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) Inquiring of management about their knowledge of fraud or suspected fraud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
24 days ago
I think the answer is A) Obtaining corroborating evidence about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77