Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AHIP Exam AHM-530 Topic 6 Question 101 Discussion

Actual exam question for AHIP's AHM-530 exam
Question #: 101
Topic #: 6
[All AHM-530 Questions]

The BBA of 1997 specifies the ways in which a Medicare+Choice plan can establish and use provider networks. A Medicare+Choice plan that operates as a private fee for service (PFFS) plan is allowed to

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Mitsue
29 days ago
Option B is the way to go, folks. Limiting provider payments to 115% of the Medicare rate - that's the key thing PFFS plans can do according to the BBA. Now excuse me while I go practice my 'haggling with providers' skills.
upvoted 0 times
Louvenia
14 days ago
It's all about negotiating those payment rates with providers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odelia
15 days ago
I agree, option B is definitely a game changer for PFFS plans.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ira
1 months ago
Alright, let's see here. I'm going to have to go with option B. It just makes the most sense when it comes to PFFS plan requirements under the BBA of '97. Solid choice, if I do say so myself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cletus
1 months ago
Haha, imagine if PFFS plans could just shift all the risk to the providers. That would be like playing 'hot potato' with Medicare-covered services! But I digress, I'd go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
Weldon
23 hours ago
User 2: I agree, it would definitely make things interesting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
19 days ago
User 1: Haha, that would be quite the game of 'hot potato' with Medicare-covered services!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ronald
2 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards option C, as PFFS plans can refuse payment to non-network providers. Gotta watch out for those sneaky non-network docs!
upvoted 0 times
Donette
1 months ago
Definitely, being aware of the rules around provider networks is crucial when choosing a Medicare+Choice plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colby
1 months ago
I agree, it's important to understand how PFFS plans handle payments to non-network providers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacey
1 months ago
I think you're onto something with option C. Non-network providers can be tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ayesha
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer might be C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dan
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gennie
2 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
2 months ago
I see your point, but I still think A is the correct answer because it makes sense for the plan to limit the size of its network to meet the needs of its enrollees.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
2 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer. The BBA of 1997 allows PFFS plans to limit the payment to providers to 115% of the Medicare rate.
upvoted 0 times
Merissa
17 days ago
Yes, it could be a challenge to find providers willing to accept the payment terms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
24 days ago
But doesn't that also mean providers may be less willing to participate?
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
1 months ago
That makes sense. It helps control costs for the plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 months ago
I agree, option B is correct. PFFS plans can limit payment to 115% of Medicare rate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eura
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
2 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77