Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AHIP Exam AHM-520 Topic 2 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for AHIP's AHM-520 exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 2
[All AHM-520 Questions]

Under GAAP, three approaches to expense recognition are generally allowed: associating cause and effect, systematic and rational allocation, and immediate recognition. A health plan most likely would use the approach of systematic and rational allocation in order to

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Carry
1 months ago
You know, if I were the health plan, I'd just skip the whole 'expense recognition' thing and go straight for the 'expense avoidance' approach. Who needs those pesky utility bills anyway?
upvoted 0 times
Tammara
10 days ago
User 3: Yeah, that makes sense. It's all about managing expenses efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
11 days ago
User 2: I think the health plan would use systematic and rational allocation to spread out commissions over time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
19 days ago
User 1: I agree, who needs to recognize expenses when you can just avoid them?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Helga
1 months ago
Ha, I bet the health plan's accountants would love to just immediately recognize all those attorney and consultant fees. Maybe in an ideal world, but GAAP says systematic allocation is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Judy
5 days ago
Definitely, but GAAP requires them to spread out those fees over time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
20 days ago
Yeah, I can imagine the accountants wishing they could just expense everything right away.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pearline
1 months ago
Hmm, I was leaning towards D for the computer system depreciation, but I guess that falls under systematic and rational allocation as well. Good catch!
upvoted 0 times
Simona
5 days ago
User 2: That makes sense, it would help in matching expenses with revenue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sonia
19 days ago
User 1: I think the health plan would use systematic and rational allocation for spreading sales force commissions over the premium paying period.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Claudia
2 months ago
I agree, B is the best choice. Systematic and rational allocation is the way to go for expenses that have a clear link to the revenue generated.
upvoted 0 times
Talia
7 days ago
User 4: That way the expenses are matched with the revenue generated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clare
10 days ago
User 3: It makes sense to spread the payment of sales force commissions over the premium paying period.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
14 days ago
User 3: I agree, systematic and rational allocation is definitely the way to go for expenses like that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
16 days ago
User 2: I agree, systematic and rational allocation is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
19 days ago
User 2: Yeah, that way the expenses are matched with the revenue they help generate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amalia
1 months ago
User 1: I think B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
1 months ago
User 1: I think B is the best choice too. It makes sense to spread out the payment of sales force commissions over the premium paying period.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Simona
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be D because depreciating the cost of a new computer system over its useful life is a common practice for businesses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Germaine
2 months ago
I agree with Selma, it helps in matching expenses with revenue which is important for financial reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
2 months ago
I think the answer is B because spreading out the payment of sales force commissions over the premium paying period makes sense for a health plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
2 months ago
Option B seems like the right approach here. Spreading the sales force commissions over the premium paying period makes sense to match the expense with the related revenue.
upvoted 0 times
Bernardo
15 days ago
Iluminada: Definitely, it provides a more accurate representation of the financial situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arleen
23 days ago
User 3: It's important to allocate expenses in a systematic and rational way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
2 months ago
User 2: Yeah, it would help match the expense with the revenue generated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
2 months ago
User 1: I agree, option B does seem like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77