Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Adobe Exam AD0-E722 Topic 6 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E722 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 6
[All AD0-E722 Questions]

An Adobe Commerce Architect needs to create a new customer segment condition to enable admins to specify an Average sales amount' condition for certain segments.

The Architect develops the custom condition under Vendor\Module\Model\Segment\Condition\AverageSalesAmount with all of its requirements:

During testing, the following error appears:

What should the Architect do to fix the problem?

A)

B)

C)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Option C is correct because adjusting the ruleset.xml file with the new rule is the simplest and most effective way to implement the new code rule. The ruleset.xml file defines the coding standards that are applied by PHP_CodeSniffer. By extending the Magento 2 Coding Standard and adding a new rule, the Architect can customize the code analysis and enforce the company coding standards.The new rule can use the Magento2.Namespaces.ForbiddenNamespaces sniff to check for any usage of Helper classes in the code and report them as errors or warnings1.

Option A is incorrect because creating a new composer package under the AwesomeAgencyCodingStandard namespace is not enough to implement the new code rule. The composer package is just a way to distribute and install the coding standard, but it does not define the rules themselves.The Architect still needs to create a ruleset.xml file and register it with PHP_CodeSniffer2.

Option B is incorrect because creating a new class AwesomeAgencyCodingStandardRulesetForbiddenNamespaces and specifying the rule inside the process method is unnecessary and complicated. The Architect does not need to create a new class or a new sniff for this rule, as there is already an existing sniff in the Magento 2 Coding Standard that can be used for this purpose.The Magento2.Namespaces.ForbiddenNamespaces sniff can be configured with an include-pattern element to specify which namespaces are forbidden1.


1: Magento 2 Coding Standards | Adobe Commerce Developer Guide

2: How to create a custom coding standard | PHP_CodeSniffer Documentation

by Johnathon at Apr 26, 2024, 02:28 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AD0-E722 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Barney
2 months ago
I'm just picturing the Architect staring at the screen, scratching their head and going, 'Wait, what?' Option A is the answer, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
Maybelle
1 months ago
Gerald: Agreed, Option A is the way to go for the Architect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
1 months ago
User 3: Definitely, Option A looks like the solution to the error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
2 months ago
User 2: Yeah, Option A seems like the right choice to fix the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
2 months ago
User 1: I think the Architect should go with Option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Derick
2 months ago
Ah, the joys of debugging custom code. I hope the Architect has a sense of humor, because this error is quite amusing. Option A is the solution, no doubt.
upvoted 0 times
Rosann
2 months ago
Yeah, I think Option A is the best choice to fix the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frankie
2 months ago
I agree, debugging can be a pain. Option A seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dominque
2 months ago
Ah, the good old namespace problem. I bet the Architect forgot to update the class name. Option A is the clear choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnna
2 months ago
Hmm, looks like the Architect needs to fix the namespace issue in the custom condition. Option A seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanda
3 months ago
Hmm, that's a good point. I see your rationale. Option B might be the better solution after all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe Option B is the best choice because it addresses the error more effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanda
3 months ago
I think the Architect should choose Option A to fix the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77