Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Adobe Exam AD0-E722 Topic 1 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E722 exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 1
[All AD0-E722 Questions]

An Adobe Commerce Architect is investigating a case where some EAV product attributes are no longer updated.

* The catalog is composed of 20.000 products with 100 attributes each.

* The product updates are run by recurring Adobe commerce imports that happen multiple times a day.

* The Architect finds an error in the logs that indicates an integrity constraint while trying to insert row with id 2147483647.

What is causing this error?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

Option A is correct because enabling asynchronous indexing can improve the checkout performance by reducing the database load and avoiding locking issues. Asynchronous indexing allows the indexers to run in the background without affecting the frontend operations.The commandbin/magento config:set dev/grid/async_indexing 1can be used to enable this option in the production mode1.

Option C is correct because creating a new database and splitting the sales tables can also improve the checkout performance by distributing the database load and avoiding contention. Splitting the database allows the checkout and order management operations to use a separate master database from the rest of the Magento application tables.The commandbin/magento setup:db-schema:split-sales --host='<checkout db host or ip>' --dbname='<name>' --username='<checkout db username>' --password=''can be used to configure this feature2.

Option B is incorrect because enabling asynchronous email notifications does not affect the checkout performance directly. Asynchronous email notifications allow the order confirmation emails to be sent in batches by a cron job instead of immediately after placing an order.This option can reduce the server load and improve the customer experience, but it does not impact the checkout process itself3.

Option D is incorrect because there is no such deploy mode as siege in Magento 2. The available deploy modes are default, developer, and production.Changing the deploy mode can affect the performance, caching, and error handling of the Magento application, but it does not directly affect the checkout performance4.

Option E is incorrect because there is no such admin panel setting as multithreaded checkout processing in Magento 2. The number of PHP threads used for checkout is determined by the web server configuration and the PHP-FPM settings, not by the Magento application settings.Increasing the number of PHP threads may improve the checkout performance, but it also requires more server resources and may cause other issues5.


1: Asynchronous indexing | Adobe Commerce Developer Guide

2: Split database performance solution | Adobe Commerce Developer Guide

3: Sales Emails | Adobe Commerce User Guide

4: Set up Magento modes | Adobe Commerce Developer Guide

5: PHP-FPM configuration settings | Adobe Commerce Developer Guide

by Desmond at Apr 27, 2024, 07:49 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AD0-E722 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Shoshana
1 months ago
I bet the poor Magento developer who had to debug this issue had a real headache. At least they can take solace in the fact that they're not the only ones dealing with these kinds of weird database problems.
upvoted 0 times
Billye
4 days ago
C) EAV attribute import uses REPLACE, which leads to reaching the max limit of the increment of the column
upvoted 0 times
...
Margo
6 days ago
B) Integrity constraints were dropped after upgrading to the latest version, and the integrity checks were missed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
11 days ago
A) Magento framework uses INSERT on DUPLICATE, which leads to reaching the max limit of the increment of the column.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tien
2 months ago
Ah, the joys of working with a large product catalog and frequent imports. This is the kind of thing that keeps us Magento architects on our toes, isn't it? I'm going with Option C as the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
Nan
3 days ago
Yeah, it makes sense that using REPLACE could lead to reaching the max limit of the column increment. Good call on choosing Option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mee
4 days ago
I think you're right. The REPLACE method in EAV attribute import could definitely be causing the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
5 days ago
I agree, dealing with EAV attributes can be tricky. Option C seems like the most likely cause of the error.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kizzy
2 months ago
Hmm, an integrity constraint error while trying to insert a row with a specific ID? That sounds like a potential issue with the auto-increment column hitting its maximum value. Option C seems the most likely culprit here.
upvoted 0 times
Yuki
3 days ago
It's possible that Magento framework using INSERT on DUPLICATE is reaching the max limit of the column.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
5 days ago
Maybe the integrity constraints were dropped after upgrading, causing the error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
7 days ago
That makes sense, the auto-increment column hitting its maximum value could be the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madonna
1 months ago
I think the error is caused by the EAV attribute import using REPLACE, reaching the max limit of the increment column.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Demetra
2 months ago
Wow, this question is really specific! I bet the answer has something to do with that pesky 32-bit integer limit. Maybe we should start a petition to switch to 64-bit for Magento, right?
upvoted 0 times
Coletta
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that makes sense. It could be hitting the max limit of the column increment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
1 months ago
User 1: I think the error is caused by Magento framework using INSERT on DUPLICATE.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amie
2 months ago
But wouldn't dropping integrity constraints, like in option B, also cause this issue?
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the reason for the error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
3 months ago
I think the error is caused by option A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77