Soft dependency, huh? I'm feeling a bit 'suggest*' ed to go with option B. But hey, what do I know? I'm just here for the certification, not the comedy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Renea

1 months ago

This is a real 'soft' spot for me. I've got to go with 'optional' on this one. Gotta keep those dependencies tight, you know?

upvoted 0 times

Myra

13 days ago

I think 'suggest' might also work for listing soft dependencies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beatriz

20 days ago

I agree, 'optional' is the way to go for soft dependencies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Moon

2 months ago

Ah, the age-old question of where to put your soft dependencies. I say, throw it in the 'soft' section and let the code gods sort it out.

upvoted 0 times

Salome

3 days ago

I've seen some modules list them under 'optional', but 'soft' makes more sense to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elsa

4 days ago

I think it's best to follow the convention and list them under 'suggest'.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louvenia

5 days ago

I usually put my soft dependencies in the 'soft' section too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leeann

2 months ago

Hmm, soft dependency? Sounds like my ex-girlfriend. Anyway, I think it should be under the 'optional' section.

upvoted 0 times

Janae

1 months ago

No, it should actually be under the 'suggest' section.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tiara

1 months ago

I think it should be under the 'optional' section.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laquanda

2 months ago

But isn't 'suggest' used for optional dependencies, while 'soft' is specifically for soft dependencies?

upvoted 0 times

...

Weldon

3 months ago

I disagree, I believe it should be listed under 'soft' in composer.json.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laquanda

3 months ago

I think the soft dependency should be listed under 'suggest' in composer.json.

upvoted 0 times

...