Adobe Exam AD0-E716 Topic 2 Question 26 Discussion

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AD0-E716 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Precious

1 months ago

Wait, is this a trick question? I bet the right answer is actually a secret combination of all three options. *winks*

upvoted 0 times

...

Sanda

1 months ago

Option C seems a bit too convoluted. I'd go with Option B - it's the most straightforward approach.

upvoted 0 times

Keneth

4 days ago

Yeah, Option C does seem a bit complicated. Option B is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Christoper

8 days ago

I think Option A could work too, but Option B is simpler.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sina

12 days ago

I agree, Option B is definitely the most straightforward choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Remedios

2 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to review the Magento DI documentation again to make sure I understand the proper syntax.

upvoted 0 times

Oliva

14 days ago

User 3: I believe they need to use the tag to pass the new instance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Billy

27 days ago

User 2: Yes, they can specify the dependency in the di.xml file.

upvoted 0 times

...

Inocencia

1 months ago

User 1: I think the developer can achieve this by using di.xml file.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melinda

2 months ago

I believe Option A is the correct way to achieve this based on the image provided.

upvoted 0 times

...

Raylene

2 months ago

I agree, di.xml is the way to go for injecting dependencies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavonda

2 months ago

Option B looks like the correct way to inject the Magento\\Filesystem\\Adapter\\Local instance into the Custom\\Module\\Model\\Example class.

upvoted 0 times

Dean

1 months ago

Let's go with Option B then, it seems like the most suitable solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mollie

1 months ago

I agree, Option B looks like the best option for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kayleigh

2 months ago

Yes, Option B seems to be the correct choice for injecting the instance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emilio

2 months ago

I think Option B is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Azzie

2 months ago

I think the developer should use di.xml to achieve this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Derrick

2 months ago

I believe Option A is the correct way to achieve this based on the image provided.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joseph

3 months ago

I agree, di.xml is the way to go for injecting dependencies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Viva

3 months ago

I think the developer should use di.xml to achieve this.

upvoted 0 times

...