Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe Exam AD0-E327 Topic 2 Question 45 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E327 exam
Question #: 45
Topic #: 2
[All AD0-E327 Questions]

A company's data includes recipients and transactions for recipients with a one(recipient) to many(transactions) relationship.

What is the most efficient configuration of a workflow Query activity to select all transactions in a particular time period?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Within the Adobe Campaign Control Panel, when an IP range is listed as 'Expired' and set to be automatically deleted after a certain period, typically the business practitioner has the ability to edit the duration of the IP range during this grace period. This action effectively extends the validity of the IP range before it is deleted, allowing for continued access based on that IP range. Reference: The Control Panel functionality in Adobe Campaign includes managing IP allowlists and their durations, which is essential for ensuring secure and uninterrupted access for authorized IP ranges.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Sean
1 months ago
Option B is the clear winner here. No need to overthink it - just a simple tweak to the default filtering conditions. Although, I do wonder if the developers had a little too much coffee when they came up with Option D.
upvoted 0 times
Tori
12 days ago
Option B is definitely the way to go. It's simple and effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yaeko
2 months ago
Option D, really? Creating a separate list just to reference in the Query activity? That's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. I'll take the direct approach of Option B.
upvoted 0 times
Ashlee
15 days ago
User 3: I think Option B is the way to go as well. It simplifies the process without unnecessary steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
16 days ago
User 2: Elbert, I agree. Option B seems like the more direct and efficient approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antione
29 days ago
User 1: Option D, really? Creating a separate list just to reference in the Query activity? That's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Truman
2 months ago
Hmm, Option C with the Incremental query sounds intriguing, but it might be overkill for this scenario. Why not stick with the classic Option B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maia
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option D could also work by creating a list and referencing it in the Query activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
2 months ago
I agree with Carey, option A seems like the best choice for selecting transactions in a particular time period.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colby
2 months ago
I agree, Option B is the way to go. No need to reinvent the wheel when the default query settings can be easily customized.
upvoted 0 times
Crista
29 days ago
Agreed, no need to complicate things when the default settings can be easily adjusted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olen
1 months ago
I think Option B is the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
1 months ago
Exactly, it's all about customizing the filtering conditions for the specific time period.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
1 months ago
Definitely, no need to complicate things when the default settings can be adjusted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
1 months ago
Agreed, it's the most efficient way to handle the query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julieta
2 months ago
I think Option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Precious
2 months ago
Option B seems the most straightforward. Why complicate things with an Incremental query or a separate list? Just edit the default filtering conditions - simple and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
2 months ago
I think the most efficient configuration would be A, selecting 'Transactions' as the targeting dimension and filtering by specific Transaction dates.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77