Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe Exam AD0-E307 Topic 1 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E307 exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 1
[All AD0-E307 Questions]

The entire list of recipients for a campaign is unavailable at the start of an A/B test. The final list of the

recipients will be placed in the finalRecipients folder but they will be loaded by the time the A/B test is

complete. To start the A/B test, a list of exclusive recipients is used for the initial deliveries in the folder

testRecipients.

How should the Business Practitioner modify the workflow diagram?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Caren
1 months ago
Option D? More like Option 'Doh!' Splitting the test and then adding more data? That's like trying to bake a cake and then remembering you forgot the flour. Good luck with that one, folks!
upvoted 0 times
Stefanie
5 days ago
C) add the enrichment after the wait to add all recipients in the 'finalRecipients' folder to the complement from the split activity
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
6 days ago
B) modify the original query to all recipients in 'testRecipients' and modify the split activity to query the folder 'finalRecipients' in the complement
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
19 days ago
A) modify the existing query to query all recipients in folders 'testRecipients' and 'finalRecipients'
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Josphine
1 months ago
Option C makes the most sense to me. Wait for the final recipients to load, then enrich the data. Seems like the cleanest way to handle this scenario. Plus, it keeps the test integrity intact.
upvoted 0 times
Nobuko
6 days ago
I think option C is the way to go. It maintains the integrity of the test and ensures all recipients are included.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
7 days ago
Option C does seem like the most logical choice. Waiting for the final recipients before enriching the data makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shizue
14 days ago
I agree, option C seems like the best approach. It ensures that the final recipients are included in the test.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stacey
2 months ago
Ha! Option A is like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. Combining two folders in the initial query? Sounds like a recipe for disaster. I'll pass on that one.
upvoted 0 times
Glenn
8 days ago
I think option D could work too. Splitting the branches and adding a new query later.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
15 days ago
Option B seems like a safer choice. Splitting the activities makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tula
18 days ago
I agree, option A does seem risky. It's better to keep things separate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashon
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure Option D is a good idea. Splitting the test 50/50 and then adding the final recipients feels like it could skew the results. Better to keep the test pure and just add the final recipients to the complement.
upvoted 0 times
German
6 days ago
Yeah, Option D might introduce bias. Option C sounds like a safer bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashad
10 days ago
Option C seems like a better choice then, adding the final recipients to the complement after the wait.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
1 months ago
I agree, keeping the test pure is important for accurate results.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jenifer
2 months ago
Option B seems the most logical approach. Modifying the original query to use both folders, and then using a complement to get the remaining recipients from the final folder. Simple and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
Cordelia
18 days ago
It's a logical approach that ensures all recipients are accounted for in the A/B test.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashida
25 days ago
I think modifying the original query and using a complement is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clare
1 months ago
It definitely simplifies the process by using both folders effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
1 months ago
I agree, Option B sounds like the best way to handle the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cyril
2 months ago
I think option D is the best choice. We can split the recipients evenly and then add a new query for 'finalRecipients' after the wait.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
3 months ago
I agree with Tasia. It makes sense to have all recipients included in the query for accurate results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
3 months ago
I think we should modify the original query to include all recipients in 'testRecipients' and 'finalRecipients'.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77