Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe Exam AD0-E123 Topic 3 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E123 exam
Question #: 32
Topic #: 3
[All AD0-E123 Questions]

Review the following HTL code snippet:

use.testComponent='${com.adobe.core.models.TestComponent'@

testParam='testValue'}'>

Which two approaches correctly read the value of testParam in Sling model? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

To start an AEM instance in debug mode automatically, without manually providing JVM parameters each time, a developer can add the required JVM parameters to the AEM instance's start script. This script is executed every time the AEM instance is started, and by including the debug parameters there, the instance will automatically start in debug mode each time. The start script is typically named start.bat (for Windows) or start.sh (for Unix-based systems) and is located in the AEM installation directory.

Adding JVM parameters to a properties file under a run mode-specific directory (Option A) or setting an OSGi configuration (Option B) are not standard methods for configuring JVM debug parameters for AEM startup.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Timothy
1 months ago
Ah, the age-old question of how to properly inject testParam. I say we take a page from the Hulk's playbook and just SMASH the entire Sling model into submission. That'll show it who's boss!
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
1 months ago
A and D for sure! C is just too straightforward, and B... well, let's just say I've had a few too many RequestAttributes in my life. Time to put on my Sling model superhero cape!
upvoted 0 times
Elvera
18 days ago
I think A and D are the correct approaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Trevor
2 months ago
Hmm, this question is a bit tricky. I'm going to go with A and D, but I'm curious to see what the other candidates think. Maybe I should have paid more attention in that Sling model class.
upvoted 0 times
Samira
1 months ago
User3: I'm not sure, I would go with B and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dino
1 months ago
User2: I agree, those seem like the right choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
1 months ago
User1: I think A and D are the correct approaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Virgina
2 months ago
B and C look like they might work, but I'm not sure if they're the best approach for this specific scenario. I'll have to double-check the documentation to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
Genevive
10 days ago
Kara: Definitely, better safe than sorry when it comes to coding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
13 days ago
User 3: I agree, it's important to double-check before implementing anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kara
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, they seem like possible options. But it's always good to check the documentation to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
1 months ago
User 1: I think B and C could work for reading the value of testParam.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Belen
2 months ago
I think A and D are the correct approaches to read the value of testParam in the Sling model. The @Inject and @Source annotations are used to inject request-level data, while @Prop is used to inject component-level properties.
upvoted 0 times
Zita
29 days ago
Yes, @Inject and @Prop annotations are the right choices for accessing the value of testParam in the Sling model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julene
1 months ago
I agree, A and D are the correct approaches to read the value of testParam in the Sling model.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jolene
2 months ago
Actually, I think it's A and C because they use the correct annotations for reading the value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
2 months ago
I believe it's B and C that read the value of testParam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
3 months ago
I think the correct approaches are A and D.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77