When situational pressures and perceived opportunities are low and personal integrity is high, occupational fraud is much more likely to occur than when the opposite is true.
Well, well, well, look who's trying to pull a fast one on us! If this were true, I'd be out of a job. Nice try, exam writers, but I'm not falling for it. Definitely B) False.
Ah, the age-old conundrum of integrity versus opportunity. I'm going to have to side with Susana on this one. The opposite must be true - high integrity and low pressures/opportunities lead to less fraud, not more.
Ha! I'm pretty sure this is a trick question. If the question was asking about *unoccupied* fraud, then maybe the answer would be true. But for occupational fraud? Definitely false!
Hmm, this doesn't seem right. If personal integrity is high, then the chances of fraud should be much lower, regardless of the other factors. I'll have to go with B) False on this one.
Brett
1 months agoKeva
1 months agoKaron
5 days agoLenny
9 days agoWinifred
12 days agoJustine
2 months agoJanna
8 days agoLetha
18 days agoKarima
1 months agoWilliam
1 months agoSusana
2 months agoLizette
2 months agoLino
2 months agoLizette
2 months agoTimothy
2 months agoDenna
1 months agoDelmy
1 months agoMabel
2 months agoPearlene
2 months ago