Haha, the government doesn't have to prove the defendant knew the identity of every single participant. That's just ridiculous! Option A is the way to go.
No way, the defendant doesn't need to know all the details or objectives. That's just too high of a bar for the government to meet. I'm going with Option A.
I agree with you, option B seems more logical. It states that the conspirators accomplished the purpose of the conspiracy that was initially established.
Adelle
23 days agoMona
25 days agoEttie
1 months agoWerner
10 days agoViola
15 days agoLonna
16 days agoJerilyn
1 months agoAfton
11 days agoCasie
20 days agoArleen
1 months agoMariann
2 months agoHershel
2 months agoMariann
3 months ago