Option C is just ridiculous. Including every single detail, relevant or not, would make the report unwieldy and difficult to read. A well-written report requires discernment and focus.
I'm torn between A and C. On one hand, witness interview details could be distracting in the main report. But on the other hand, excluding any information could be seen as selective reporting.
I disagree with Option D. Using technical terms just for the sake of sounding professional is not the goal of a well-written report. The focus should be on clear and concise communication.
Option B seems the most appropriate. The report should focus on the relevant evidence that supports the fraud allegation, not irrelevant details or witness interviews.
Estrella
1 months agoLea
1 months agoEmmett
1 months agoLea
2 days agoBulah
6 days agoAnnabelle
12 days agoAnnelle
1 months agoMarica
4 days agoTammara
20 days agoLemuel
2 months agoLaurel
13 days agoValentin
27 days agoMirta
1 months agoLavonna
2 months agoFrank
21 hours agoDahlia
5 days agoPearly
16 days agoTijuana
18 days agoOdette
2 months agoRose
2 months agoOdette
3 months ago