Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ACFE Exam CFE-Investigation Topic 1 Question 79 Discussion

Actual exam question for ACFE's CFE-Investigation exam
Question #: 79
Topic #: 1
[All CFE-Investigation Questions]

Barnes, a Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE). is using data analysis to identify anomalies that might indicate fraud in XYZ Company's accounts payable transactions. Which of the following is the MOST EFFECTIVE data analysis function that Barnes could use to look for potential fraud in accounts payable?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Bette
1 months ago
Haha, I bet Barnes is wishing he had the ability to compare book and tax depreciation like in option A. That would be a real party trick!
upvoted 0 times
Holley
13 days ago
User 3: I think reviewing recurring monthly expenses and comparing them to invoices would also be a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
15 days ago
User 2: Yeah, that would be a good way to spot any suspicious activity in the accounts payable transactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
26 days ago
User 1: Barnes could definitely catch some fraud by looking at paycheck amounts over a certain limit.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mammie
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Identifying paycheck amounts over a certain limit could also be useful to detect potential fraud, don't you think?
upvoted 0 times
Fletcher
1 days ago
D) All of the above
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
13 days ago
C) Review recurring monthly expenses and compare to posted/paid invoices
upvoted 0 times
...
Evelynn
19 days ago
B) Identify paycheck amounts over a certain limit
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
1 months ago
C) Review recurring monthly expenses and compare to posted/paid invoices
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
1 months ago
A) Compare book and tax depreciation and indicate variances
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
1 months ago
B) Identify paycheck amounts over a certain limit
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamela
2 months ago
A) Compare book and tax depreciation and indicate variances
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delmy
2 months ago
I think option D is the best choice, as it covers all possible areas of potential fraud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
2 months ago
I agree with Ashley, reviewing recurring monthly expenses can help identify anomalies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashley
2 months ago
I think option C is the most effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toshia
2 months ago
I think option D, all of the above, would be the best choice to cover all bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
2 months ago
I agree with Coletta. Checking the recurring monthly expenses against the invoices is a great way to spot any suspicious activities in the accounts payable.
upvoted 0 times
Erick
28 days ago
User 2: True, but I believe checking paycheck amounts over a certain limit is more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
1 months ago
User 1: I think comparing book and tax depreciation could also help in identifying fraud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
1 months ago
User 2: True, but I believe checking paycheck amounts over a certain limit is more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
1 months ago
User 1: I think comparing book and tax depreciation could also help in identifying fraud.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Agustin
2 months ago
I agree with Erasmo, reviewing recurring monthly expenses can help identify fraud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
2 months ago
I think option C is the most effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
2 months ago
Option C seems the most effective data analysis function to look for potential fraud in accounts payable. Reviewing recurring monthly expenses and comparing them to posted/paid invoices could uncover any discrepancies or anomalies.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77