AACE International Exam AACE-PSP Topic 3 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for AACE International's AACE-PSP exam

Question #: 25
Topic #: 3

[All AACE-PSP Questions]

Which of the following options is NOT a feasible method to reduce the overall completion time of the toll road program?

ASubcontract outside forces to accelerate the Phase A Schedule

BAllocating forces from other BILCO contracts to the toll road project

CProceeding with the work in advance of the environmental studies

DReduce the phasing from 5 phases to 3 phases

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Viola at Sep 17, 2024, 04:58 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AACE-PSP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lauran

1 months ago

I'm just hoping the answer isn't 'All of the above'. That would be a real head-scratcher!

upvoted 0 times

...

Linette

1 months ago

Wait, they're asking which option is NOT feasible? That's a bit of a tricky one. I hope I don't fall for the old 'trick question' ploy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eveline

2 months ago

Option A is the way to go! Subcontracting outside help is the quickest solution. Plus, it'll free up my time for a much-needed coffee break.

upvoted 0 times

Rodney

5 days ago

C) Proceeding with the work in advance of the environmental studies

upvoted 0 times

...

Theodora

10 days ago

B) Allocating forces from other BILCO contracts to the toll road project

upvoted 0 times

...

Salena

24 days ago

A) Subcontract outside forces to accelerate the Phase A Schedule

upvoted 0 times

...

Dallas

2 months ago

Option D sounds promising, but reducing the phasing might create other logistical challenges. I'll have to think that one through.

upvoted 0 times

Meaghan

24 days ago

Allocating forces from other contracts might help, but it could impact those projects negatively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luis

1 months ago

Subcontracting outside forces seems like a good option to speed up the project.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merilyn

1 months ago

I agree, reducing the phasing could lead to more complications down the road.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roxane

2 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about Option B. Pulling resources from other projects could cause issues there. It's a risky move.

upvoted 0 times

Mindy

1 months ago

I think we should focus on options that won't jeopardize other contracts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leoma

1 months ago

I agree, Option B does seem risky. It could impact other projects negatively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reyes

2 months ago

Option C is definitely not feasible. That would be a major violation of environmental regulations. I can't believe they even included that as an option.

upvoted 0 times

Ernie

1 months ago

Allocating forces from other contracts might cause delays in those projects.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephanie

1 months ago

I think reducing the phasing could also help speed up the project.

upvoted 0 times

...

Abel

1 months ago

Subcontracting outside forces seems like a better option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Celeste

2 months ago

I agree, option C is definitely not a good idea.

upvoted 0 times

...

Viola

2 months ago

But wouldn't reducing the phasing compromise the quality of the project?

upvoted 0 times

...

Nilsa

3 months ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is D) Reduce the phasing from 5 phases to 3 phases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Viola

3 months ago

I think the answer is C) Proceeding with the work in advance of the environmental studies.

upvoted 0 times

...