Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

AACE International Exam AACE-PSP Topic 2 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for AACE International's AACE-PSP exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 2
[All AACE-PSP Questions]

What changes to logic would eliminate Activity B from the critical path?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Ashley at Feb 10, 2025, 04:55 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AACE-PSP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Portia
3 months ago
Why don't we just rearrange the activities like a game of Jenga? That'll definitely eliminate Activity B from the critical path!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
3 months ago
Reducing the lag value from 5 to 0? Sounds like a magic trick to me. What is this, a game of Tetris?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
3 months ago
Hold up, I've got a better idea. Let's replace the relationship from Activity A to Activity B with FFO and add an FSO relationship from Activity A to Activity C. That should do the trick!
upvoted 0 times
Hyman
3 months ago
I agree, let's make those changes and see if Activity B is no longer on the critical path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
3 months ago
I think we should also consider reducing the lag value of the relationship from Activity A to Activity B from 5 to 0.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
3 months ago
That sounds like a good plan. It might work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Suzi
3 months ago
Hmm, I don't think any of these options are quite right. What if we added a SS 15 relationship from Activity A to Activity B and replaced the relationship from Activity A to Activity B with FFO? That might work.
upvoted 0 times
Melodie
2 months ago
It's worth a try. Let's make those changes and see if it works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noelia
2 months ago
Maybe we should test it out and see what happens.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
3 months ago
I'm not sure if that would eliminate Activity B from the critical path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
3 months ago
That's an interesting idea. It could potentially work.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mitsue
3 months ago
I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't replacing the relationship from Activity B to Activity C with SSO be a better choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Toshia
4 months ago
Option B seems like the way to go. Reducing the lag value from 5 to 0 should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
Leoma
3 months ago
I agree, that change would definitely help eliminate Activity B from the critical path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
3 months ago
Option B seems like the way to go. Reducing the lag value from 5 to 0 should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
3 months ago
User 2: Agreed, reducing the lag value from 5 to 0 should remove Activity B from the critical path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
3 months ago
User 1: I think option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reid
4 months ago
I think option D makes the most sense, as it involves replacing relationships and adding new ones to bypass Activity B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernell
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C would be more effective in removing Activity B from the critical path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
4 months ago
I think option A could eliminate Activity B from the critical path.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77