Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AACE International Exam AACE-PSP Topic 2 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for AACE International's AACE-PSP exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 2
[All AACE-PSP Questions]

How could the structural steel drawing delay have been prevented?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Vannessa
1 years ago
Option C is like playing structural steel Tetris. I wouldn't want to be the one responsible for that gamble.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catherin
1 years ago
I'm going with B. Proactive planning is key to avoiding delays in a project like this.
upvoted 0 times
Beckie
11 months ago
C) Release the structural steel for fabrication concurrent with review of structural steel shop drawings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
11 months ago
C) Release the structural steel for fabrication concurrent with review of structural steel shop drawings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rossana
11 months ago
I agree with B. Proactive planning is crucial to prevent delays.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaac
11 months ago
I agree, proactive planning is essential to prevent delays.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rachael
11 months ago
B) Allow adequate time for review and resubmittal in the baseline schedule.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
12 months ago
B) Allow adequate time for review and resubmittal in the baseline schedule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
12 months ago
A) Add a time buffer at the end of structural steel activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
1 years ago
A) Add a time buffer at the end of structural steel activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Golda
1 years ago
C is an interesting idea, but it's a risky move. You might end up with a lot of rework if the drawings aren't approved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martha
1 years ago
D? Really? That's a bit extreme, don't you think? Switching construction methods is a huge undertaking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
1 years ago
Option B seems like the obvious choice here. You need to plan for that review process upfront.
upvoted 0 times
Ressie
12 months ago
Yeah, planning for review and resubmittal time is crucial in preventing delays.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
12 months ago
I agree, adding a time buffer at the end would have helped.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
12 months ago
B) Allow adequate time for review and resubmittal in the baseline schedule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
1 years ago
Switching to post-tensioned concrete construction could have been a drastic but effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
1 years ago
A) Add a time buffer at the end of structural steel activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
1 years ago
I think releasing the structural steel for fabrication concurrent with review of shop drawings would have been more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
1 years ago
I agree, adding a time buffer at the end of structural steel activities could have helped.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77